The Neutral State and the Mandatory Crucifix
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2011 |
| Journal | Religion and Human Rights |
| Volume | Issue number | 6 | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 267-272 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | In this article we present a conceptual overview of relevant interpretations of what state neutrality may imply; we suggest a distinction between inclusive neutrality and exclusive neutrality. This distinction provides a useful framework for understanding the several positions as presented by the parties in the Lautsi case. We conclude by suggesting a solution of the Lautsi case that might provide a more viable solution. |
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at |
https://doi.org/10.1163/187103211X599427
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |