The Neutral State and the Mandatory Crucifix
| Authors |
|
| Publication date |
2011
|
| Journal |
Religion and Human Rights
|
| Volume | Issue number |
6 | 3
|
| Pages (from-to) |
267-272
|
| Number of pages |
5
|
| Organisations |
-
Faculty of Law (FdR) - Paul Scholten Centre for Jurisprudence (PSC)
|
| Abstract |
In this article we present a conceptual overview of relevant interpretations of what state neutrality may imply; we suggest a distinction between inclusive neutrality and exclusive neutrality. This distinction provides a useful framework for understanding the several positions as presented by the parties in the Lautsi case. We conclude by suggesting a solution of the Lautsi case that might provide a more viable solution.
|
| Document type |
Article
|
| Language |
English
|
| Published at |
https://doi.org/10.1163/187103211X599427
|
|
Permalink to this page
|
Back