On subtler belief revision policies
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2017 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Logic, Rationality, and Interaction |
| Book subtitle | 6th International Workshop, LORI 2017, Sapporo, Japan, September 11-14, 2017 : proceedings |
| ISBN |
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
| Event | 6th International Workshop Logic, Rationality, and Interaction |
| Pages (from-to) | 314-329 |
| Publisher | Berlin: Springer |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | This paper proposes three subtle revision policies that are not propositionally successful (after a single application the agent might not believe the given propositional formula), but nevertheless are not propositionally idempotent (further applications might affect the agent’s epistemic state). It also compares them with two well-known revision policies, arguing that the subtle ones might provide a more faithful representation of humans’ real-life revision processes. |
| Document type | Conference contribution |
| Language | English |
| Published at |
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55665-8_22
(Final published version)
|
| Published at |
http://bit.ly/2vVmyKb
(Accepted author manuscript)
|
| Permalink to this page | |