Quels critères pour déterminer la "meilleure" explication scientifique?
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2017 |
| Journal | Tranel |
| Volume | Issue number | 65 |
| Pages (from-to) | 79-88 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | In justifying their choice of the 'best' scientific explanation from a number of candidate explanations, scientists may employ specific theoretical virtues and other criteria for good scientific theories. This paper is aimed at providing an inventory of such criteria and at analyzing how they function argumentatively by indicating their systematic place within the pattern of argumentation based on abduction. |
| Document type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Published at |
http://www.unine.ch/files/live/sites/tranel/files/Tranel/65/79-88_Wagemans_def.pdf
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
