Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials

Authors
  • B.B. Reeve
  • S.A. Mitchell
  • A.C. Dueck
  • E. Basch
  • D. Cella
  • C. Miller Reilly
  • L.M. Minasian
  • A.M. Denicoff
  • A.M. O'Mara
  • M.J. Fisch
  • C. Chauhan
  • N.K. Aaronson
  • C. Coens
  • D. Watkins Bruner
Publication date 2014
Journal Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Article number dju129
Volume | Issue number 106 | 7
Pages (from-to) dju129
Number of pages 8
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract
Background: The National Cancer Institute’s Symptom Management and Health-Related Quality of Life Steering Committee held a clinical trials planning meeting (September 2011) to identify a core symptom set to be assessed across oncology trials for the purposes of better understanding treatment efficacy and toxicity and to facilitate cross-study comparisons. We report the results of an evidence-synthesis and consensus-building effort that culminated in recommendations for core symptoms to be measured in adult cancer clinical trials that include a patient-reported outcome (PRO).

Methods: We used a data-driven, consensus-building process. A panel of experts, including patient representatives, conducted a systematic review of the literature (2001-2011) and analyzed six large datasets. Results were reviewed at a multistakeholder meeting, and a final set was derived emphasizing symptom prevalence across diverse cancer populations, impact on health outcomes and quality of life, and attribution to either disease or anticancer treatment.

Results: We recommend that a core set of 12 symptoms—specifically fatigue, insomnia, pain, anorexia (appetite loss), dyspnea, cognitive problems, anxiety (includes worry), nausea, depression (includes sadness), sensory neuropathy, constipation, and diarrhea—be considered for inclusion in clinical trials where a PRO is measured. Inclusion of symptoms and other patient-reported endpoints should be well justified, hypothesis driven, and meaningful to patients.

Conclusions: This core set will promote consistent assessment of common and clinically relevant disease- and treatment-related symptoms across cancer trials. As such, it provides a foundation to support data harmonization and continued efforts to enhance measurement of patient-centered outcomes in cancer clinical trials and observational studies.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju129
Permalink to this page
Back