Finding evidence to inform the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews of randomized trials

Authors	D. Moher
Supervisors	P.M.M. Bossuyt
Award date	18-03-2004
Number of pages	217
Organisations	Faculty of Medicine (AMC-UvA)
Document type	PhD thesis
Language	English
Downloads	Thesis Cover Titlepage Contents Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline? Chapter 3 Does the inclusion of grey literature influence the estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? Chapter 4 Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews Chapter 5 What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? Chapter 6 Does quality of reports of □moxicilli trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Chapter 7 Language of publication restrictions and estimates of intervention effectiveness: know your intervention Chapter 8 Is there a "best" way to minimize publication bias? An empirical evaluation. Chapter 9 A comparison of the quality of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in paper-based journals Chapter 10 Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement Samenvatting Dankwoord Co-authors Other publications (related to systematic reviews) Curriculum vitae Cover
Permalink to this page

Back

UvA-DARE