Ecological Unequal Exchange Winners and Losers in Global Raw Material Trade and Consumption

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2025
Journal Journal of World-Systems Research
Volume | Issue number 31 | 1
Pages (from-to) 341-372
Number of pages 32
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract

The Marxist theory of unequal exchange challenges the idea that trade never results in outright losses. As a biophysical process, ecological unequal exchange reveals global disparities in resource flows. Using material flow analysis, alternative indicators, and new country clusters, this study updates earlier research and identifies a new phase of intensified disparities since 2015, with rising net outflows of resources from low-income countries (LICs) to high-income countries (HICs). From 1970 to 2024, HICs accumulated 290 gigatons (Gt) of raw material equivalents (RMEs) as net imports, while upper-middle-income, lower-middle-income, and low-income countries net-exported 164 Gt, 53.1 Gt, and 9.6 Gt, respectively. In a relative sense, LICs consume 13.3 percent less RMEs than they extract domestically, while HICs consume 25.4 percent more. This study challenges assumptions about global divisions of labor: not all HICs are net-importers of RMEs, nor are all LICs net-exporters. However, net-exporter HICs earn more than net-exporter LICs, and net-importer HICs spend less than net-importer LICs. On average, LICs export 6 tons of RMEs to earn what HICs earns from 1 ton; for net-exporter LICs, this ratio rises to 12.7 tons. The more a country exploits the environment, domestically or abroad, the more it earns.

Document type Article
Note In Special Issue on Global Disasters and World Society
Language English
Related publication Commodifying Plunder
Published at
https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2025.1298 (Final published version)
Other links
Downloads
1298+Rammelt+et+al+page+rv+2 (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back