Ecological Unequal Exchange Winners and Losers in Global Raw Material Trade and Consumption

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2025
Journal Journal of World-Systems Research
Volume | Issue number 31 | 1
Pages (from-to) 341-372
Number of pages 32
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract

The Marxist theory of unequal exchange challenges the idea that trade never results in outright losses. As a biophysical process, ecological unequal exchange reveals global disparities in resource flows. Using material flow analysis, alternative indicators, and new country clusters, this study updates earlier research and identifies a new phase of intensified disparities since 2015, with rising net outflows of resources from low-income countries (LICs) to high-income countries (HICs). From 1970 to 2024, HICs accumulated 290 gigatons (Gt) of raw material equivalents (RMEs) as net imports, while upper-middle-income, lower-middle-income, and low-income countries net-exported 164 Gt, 53.1 Gt, and 9.6 Gt, respectively. In a relative sense, LICs consume 13.3 percent less RMEs than they extract domestically, while HICs consume 25.4 percent more. This study challenges assumptions about global divisions of labor: not all HICs are net-importers of RMEs, nor are all LICs net-exporters. However, net-exporter HICs earn more than net-exporter LICs, and net-importer HICs spend less than net-importer LICs. On average, LICs export 6 tons of RMEs to earn what HICs earns from 1 ton; for net-exporter LICs, this ratio rises to 12.7 tons. The more a country exploits the environment, domestically or abroad, the more it earns.

Document type Article
Note In Special Issue on Global Disasters and World Society
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2025.1298
Other links https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105003964122
Downloads
1298+Rammelt+et+al+page+rv+2 (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back