Restrictions of frequent frames as cues to categories: the case of Dutch
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2008 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | A supplement to the Proceedings of the 32nd Boston University Conference on Language Development |
| Event | 32nd Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-12 |
| Publisher | [Boston]: BUCLD |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Why Dutch 12-month-old infants do not use frequent frames in early categorization
Mintz (2003) proposes that very local distributional contexts of words in the input-so-called 'frequent frames'-function as reliable cues for categories corresponding to the adult verb and noun. He shows that categories resulting from frequent frames align with English grammatical categories for over 90% and that American 12-month-olds use these frequent frames to form a verbal category. Based on Dutch input and child data, I will show that frequent frames are not generally valid as a cue to categories. In a replication of Mintz (2003) for the input to Dutch children, I found that the frame-based categories aligned with Dutch grammatical categories for only 40%-71%. Furthermore, Dutch 12-month-olds did not use these cues in an experiment designed parallel to Mintz (2006). Even Dutch 16-montholds did not use the cues, although there was some development towards the English pattern between the two age groups. |
| Document type | Conference contribution |
| Published at | http://128.197.86.186/posters/32/Erkelens.pdf |
| Downloads | |
| Permalink to this page | |