Rougher is more slippery How adhesive friction decreases with increasing surface roughness due to the suppression of capillary adhesion

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 12-2021
Journal Physical Review Research
Article number 043204
Volume | Issue number 3 | 4
Number of pages 9
Organisations
  • Faculty of Science (FNWI) - Van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS)
  • Faculty of Science (FNWI) - Institute of Physics (IoP)
  • Faculty of Science (FNWI) - Institute of Physics (IoP) - Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute (WZI)
Abstract

Friction originates at the area of real contact which depends on the (changing) surface topography. Observing and measuring the area of real contact at multi-asperity interfaces is difficult, making it challenging to quantitatively study the interplay between the frictional force and surface topography. In this paper, we systematically manipulate surface topography and use a fluorescence microscopy-based contact visualization technique to reveal this interplay. We demonstrate good agreement between elastoplastic boundary element method contact calculations and experimental visualization of the area of real contact. While the area of real contact and thus contact pressure could be varied by a factor of 4 through control of the surface topography, this had only a modest effect on the coefficient of friction (CoF). We do find a small but systematic increase in the proportionality constant between frictional force and normal force (CoF) with decreasing surface roughness. The observation that smoother surfaces have a greater CoF is due to capillary adhesion between the two surfaces. We quantitatively model this behavior using a simple capillary adhesion model without adjustable parameters. Our results provide quantitative insights into the interplay between contact mechanics, friction, and capillary adhesion. A predictive understanding of this interplay is essential to demanding applications such as precision positioning.

Document type Article
Note - The work in this paper was carried out at ARCNL. This paper is part of the project “Friction on demand: to slide or not to slide” with Project No. VI.Veni.192.177, which is (partly) financed by the Dutch Research Council. - With supplementary file
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043204
Other links https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85122517634
Downloads
PhysRevResearch.3.043204 (Final published version)
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back