Improving adherence to daily preexposure prophylaxis among MSM in Amsterdam by providing feedback via a mobile application

Authors
  • M.A.M. van den Elshout
  • E. Hoornenborg
  • R.C.A. Achterbergh
  • L. Coyer
  • P.L. Anderson
  • U. Davidovich
  • H.J.C. de Vries
  • M. Prins
  • M.F. Schim van der Loeff
  • Amsterdam PrEP Project team in the HIV Transmission Elimination AMsterdam Initiative (H-TEAM)
Publication date 01-09-2021
Journal AIDS
Volume | Issue number 35 | 11
Pages (from-to) 1823-1834
Number of pages 12
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract
Objective:
Improving adherence to preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by providing automated feedback on self-reported PrEP use via a mobile application (app).

Design:
Randomized clinical trial among MSM participating in the Amsterdam PrEP demonstration project (AMPrEP).

Methods:
Eligible participants were randomized 1 : 1 to the control or intervention app. Both allowed daily reporting of sexual behaviour and medication intake; the intervention app also provided visual feedback. Dried blood spots collected at 12 and 24 months yielded intracellular tenofovir diphosphate concentrations (TFV-DP). We assessed proportions of participants with poor (TFV-DP <700 fmol/punch; primary outcome), good (TFV-DP ≥700 fmol/punch) and excellent (TFV-DP ≥1250 fmol/punch; secondary outcome) adherence at both time-points, and the association with the control or intervention app.

Results:
We randomized 229 participants, 118 to the intervention and 111 to the control arm. The primary, per-protocol, analysis included 83 participants per arm. In total, 22/166 (13%) of participants adhered poorly, 144/166 (87%) good and 66/166 (40%) excellently. App feedback did not result in a lower proportion of participants with poor adherence [control: 9 of 83 (11%); intervention: 13 of 83 (16%); P = 0.36]. App feedback did result in a larger proportion of participants with excellent adherence [control: 26/83 (31%); intervention: 40/83 (48%); P = 0.026].

Conclusion:
In this highly adherent population, app feedback did not improve the proportion of participants with poor adherence to PrEP.
Document type Article
Note With supplementary file
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000002949
Permalink to this page
Back