Dual track or academic route for auditors: does it matter?
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2006 |
| Journal | Applied Economics |
| Volume | Issue number | 38 | 9 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1019-1035 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
In the Netherlands auditors can be trained in a part-time educational track in which students combine working and studying or in a full-time educational track. The former training is relatively firm-specific whereas the latter training is relatively general. Applying human capital theory, we expect higher wage growth for full-time educated auditors than for dual-educated auditors. Furthermore, full-time educated auditors may have better outside options than part-time educated auditors. This may make it easier for them to switch employers than for the part-time educated auditors. The predictions on tenure and wages of differently educated auditors are supported by the estimation results in this paper. The part-time, dual track appears an important route for students from a lower socioeconomic background.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500400459 |
| Permalink to this page | |
