Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 03-2023
Journal Computational Brain and Behavior
Volume | Issue number 6 | 1
Pages (from-to) 127–139
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract

In van Doorn et al. (2021), we outlined a series of open questions concerning Bayes factors for mixed effects model comparison, with an emphasis on the impact of aggregation, the effect of measurement error, the choice of prior distributions, and the detection of interactions. Seven expert commentaries (partially) addressed these initial questions. Surprisingly perhaps, the experts disagreed (often strongly) on what is best practice—a testament to the intricacy of conducting a mixed effect model comparison. Here, we provide our perspective on these comments and highlight topics that warrant further discussion. In general, we agree with many of the commentaries that in order to take full advantage of Bayesian mixed model comparison, it is important to be aware of the specific assumptions that underlie the to-be-compared models.

Document type Comment/Letter to the editor
Language English
Related publication Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: a Discussion Bayes Factors for Mixed Models
Published at https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00158-x
Other links https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85147991441
Downloads
s42113-022-00158-x (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back