Development of the Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI): Assessing index patients' knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy regarding the disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information to relatives
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2015 |
| Journal | International Journal of Behavioral Medicine |
| Volume | Issue number | 22 | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 551-560 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Background: Despite the use of genetic services, counselees do not always share hereditary cancer information with at-risk relatives. Reasons for not informing relatives may be categorized as a lack of: knowledge, motivation, and/or self-efficacy.
Purpose: This study aims to develop and test the psychometric properties of the Informing Relatives Inventory, a battery of instruments that intend to measure counselees’ knowledge, motivation, and self-efficacy regarding the disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information to at-risk relatives. Method: Guided by the proposed conceptual framework, existing instruments were selected and new instruments were developed. We tested the instruments’ acceptability, dimensionality, reliability, and criterion-related validity in consecutive index patients visiting the Clinical Genetics department with questions regarding hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer or colon cancer. Results: Data of 211 index patients were included (response rate = 62 %). The Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI) assesses three barriers in disclosure representing seven domains. Instruments assessing index patients’ (positive) motivation and self-efficacy were acceptable and reliable and suggested good criterion-related validity. Psychometric properties of instruments assessing index patients knowledge were disputable. These items were moderately accepted by index patients and the criterion-related validity was weaker. Conclusion: This study presents a first conceptual framework and associated inventory (IRI) that improves insight into index patients’ barriers regarding the disclosure of genetic cancer information to at-risk relatives. Instruments assessing (positive) motivation and self-efficacy proved to be reliable measurements. Measuring index patients knowledge appeared to be more challenging. Further research is necessary to ensure IRI’s dimensionality and sensitivity to change. |
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9455-x |
| Downloads |
art%3A10.1007%2Fs12529-014-9455-x
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |