The effects of response inhibition training following binge memory retrieval in young adults binge eaters: a randomised-controlled experimental study

Open Access
Authors
  • R.K. Das
  • E.A. Cawley
  • L. Simeonov
  • G. Piazza
Publication date 03-06-2022
Journal Scientific Reports
Article number 9281
Volume | Issue number 12
Number of pages 12
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract

Binge eating is increasingly prevalent among adolescents and young adults and can have a lasting harmful impact on mental and physical health. Mechanistic insights suggest that aberrant reward-learning and biased cognitive processing may be involved in the aetiology of binge eating. We therefore investigated whether recently developed approaches to catalyse brief interventions by putatively updating maladaptive memory could also boost the effects of cognitive bias modification training on binge eating behaviour. A non-treatment-seeking sample of 90 binge eating young adults were evenly randomised to undergo either selective food response inhibition training, or sham training following binge memory reactivation. A third group received training without binge memory reactivation. Laboratory measures of reactivity and biased responses to food cues were assessed pre-post intervention and bingeing behaviour and disordered eating assessed up to 9 months post-intervention. The protocol was pre-registered at https://osf.io/82c4r/. We found limited evidence of premorbid biased processing in lab-assessed measures of cognitive biases to self-selected images of typical binge foods. Accordingly, there was little evidence of CBM reducing these biases and this was not boosted by prior ‘reactivation’ of binge food reward memories. No group differences were observed on long-term bingeing behaviour, caloric consumption or disordered eating symptomatology. These findings align with recent studies showing limited impact of selective inhibition training on binge eating and do not permit conclusions regarding the utility of retrieval-dependent memory ‘update’ mechanisms as a treatment catalyst for response inhibition training.

Document type Article
Note With supplementary file
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12173-w
Other links https://osf.io/82c4r/ https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85131192609
Downloads
s41598-022-12173-w (Final published version)
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back