Reasonableness of a doctor’s argument by authority: a pragma-dialectical analysis of the specific soundness conditions

Authors
Publication date 2014
Host editors
  • S. Rubinelli
  • A.F. Snoeck Henkemans
Book title Argumentation and health
ISBN
  • 9789027242525
Series Benjamins current topics, 64
Pages (from-to) 33-50
Number of pages 17
Publisher Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
Abstract
Argumentation can play an important role in medical consultation. A doctor could, for instance, argue in support of a treatment advice to overcome a patient’s hesitance about it. In this argumentation, the doctor might explicitly present him- or herself as an authority, thereby presenting an argument by authority. Depending on the specific conditions under which the doctor advances such an argument, the doctor’s argument by authority can constitute a sound or a fallacious contribution to the discussion. In this chapter, I shall determine what the specific soundness conditions are that apply to a doctor’s argumentation by authority in medical consultation.
Document type Chapter
Note Publ. before in: Journal of Argumentation in Context, Vol. 1:1 (2012)
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.64.04pil
Permalink to this page
Back