Modal Concord
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2007 |
| Journal | Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory |
| Event | Semantics and Linguistic Theory 17 (SALT XVII) |
| Volume | Issue number | 17 |
| Pages (from-to) | 317-332 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Sentences containing two (or more) modal elements of the same modal type and quantificational force often yield a concord reading, where the semantics of the sentence seems to contain only one modal operator, rather than a cumulative reading. In this paper I have argued that Modal Concord is a grammatical phenomenon and that despite superficial differences, it shows close resemblance to the phenomenon of Negative Concord. I have argued that the approach by (Zeijlstra 2004), who takes Negative Concord to be an instance of syntactic agreement, naturally extends to Modal Concord, and I have provided an analysis for Modal Concord by arguing that modal elements carry a modal feature specified for quantificational force, which is either semantically interpretable or uninterpretable. Furthermore, I have proposed that modal auxiliaries are semantically vacuous in languages like English and Dutch and that they only signal the presence of an abstract modal operator of a particular quantificational force.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Note | Proceedings of the 17th Semantics and Linguistic Theory conference, held May 11-13, 2007 at The University of Connecticut |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v17i0.2961 |
| Published at | http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000494 |
| Downloads |
63739_zeijlstra_07_Modal_Concor_1_.2
(Accepted author manuscript)
2961-3236-1-PB
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |