Instrument-order effects: using the oral health impact profile 49 and the short form 12

Authors
Publication date 2011
Journal European Journal of Oral Sciences
Volume | Issue number 119 | 1
Pages (from-to) 69-72
Organisations
  • Faculty of Dentistry (ACTA)
Abstract
Whereas it is well known that the ordering of items can influence research outcomes considerably, very little literature addresses instrument-order effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of changing the administrative order of the Short-Form-12 (SF-12) and the Oral Health Impact Profile-49 (OHIP-49). It was hypothesized that if the SF-12 was administered first, the results would show poorer scores on the SF-12 subscales, as responses would not be restrained to only the oral impacts described by the OHIP-49. Using the Mann-Whitney U-test no significant instrument-order effects were found, except for the Psychological discomfort scale of the OHIP-49, where subjects scored higher when receiving the OHIP-49 first. However, the effect size was negligible (−0.08). These results suggest that no instrument-order effects occurred. Nonetheless, more research dealing with different instruments is needed. This study was performed within a dental setting and we recommend that instrument-order effects should be studied outside this domain.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00796.x
Permalink to this page
Back