Instrument-order effects: using the oral health impact profile 49 and the short form 12
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2011 |
| Journal | European Journal of Oral Sciences |
| Volume | Issue number | 119 | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 69-72 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Whereas it is well known that the ordering of items can influence research outcomes considerably, very little literature addresses instrument-order effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of changing the administrative order of the Short-Form-12 (SF-12) and the Oral Health Impact Profile-49 (OHIP-49). It was hypothesized that if the SF-12 was administered first, the results would show poorer scores on the SF-12 subscales, as responses would not be restrained to only the oral impacts described by the OHIP-49. Using the Mann-Whitney U-test no significant instrument-order effects were found, except for the Psychological discomfort scale of the OHIP-49, where subjects scored higher when receiving the OHIP-49 first. However, the effect size was negligible (−0.08). These results suggest that no instrument-order effects occurred. Nonetheless, more research dealing with different instruments is needed. This study was performed within a dental setting and we recommend that instrument-order effects should be studied outside this domain.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00796.x |
| Permalink to this page | |