Interruption and Interpellation: Leaving the Theater in Search of the Theater
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2021 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Oxford Handbook of Performance and Politics |
| ISBN |
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Series | Oxford Handbooks |
| Pages (from-to) | 455–470 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Publisher | New York: Oxford University Press |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
This chapter reflects on the significance of interruption in performance. Under which conditions might interruption be deemed political? And what precisely accords such interruptive gestures an interpellative quality, the capacity to usher a sense of political subjecthood into being? The chapter dwells on three scenes of interruption: in Walter Benjamin’s writings on Bertolt Brecht, in Louis Althusser’s ideology theory, and a scene from a 2018 public lecture-performance in Amsterdam by the scholar-artist Chokri Ben Chikha., In the artist’s gesture toward self-immolation, the protocols of theatrical performance are interrupted in order to reflect on the political efficacy of performance. By way of a complementary reading of Benjamin’s elaboration of the Brechtian ‘gestus’ and Louis Althusser’s conception of ideological interpellation, the chapter suggests that performance and politics are related by the ways in which they interrupt and interpellate each other.
|
| Document type | Chapter |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190863456.013.51 |
| Downloads |
290501197
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |