Inhibition in memory
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2018 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Stevens' Handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. - Volume 1 |
| Book subtitle | Language and Memory |
| ISBN |
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Edition | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 251-284 |
| Publisher | New York: Wiley |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
In the past 20 years, a new approach to forgetting has been proposed, based on the notion of inhibition. According to this view forgetting is partly due to a process of inhibitory control. In this chapter, I review the current status of this account, discussing the evidence that has been proposed as well as the counterarguments that have been made. I show that the paradigms that are likely to generate the best evidence for inhibition are the retrieval‐induced forgetting paradigm and the think/no‐think paradigm. Other paradigms, such as directed forgetting and part‐list cuing, seem to be better explained using other memory principles. I conclude that there is a need for a consistent and preferably formalized model that combines inhibition and competition as principal factors in forgetting.
|
| Document type | Chapter |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn108 |
| Downloads |
Inhibition in memory final version
(Accepted author manuscript)
|
| Permalink to this page | |