Suppositions in argumentative discussions: A pragma-dialectical solution for two puzzles concerning thought experimentation

Authors
Publication date 2015
Host editors
  • B. Garssen
  • D. Godden
  • G. Mitchell
  • A.F. Snoeck Henkemans
Book title International Society for the Study of Argumentation: 8th International Conference on Argumentation: July 1-July 4, 2014, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
ISBN
  • 9789036104500
Event 8th Conference on Argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation: ISSA 2014
Pages (from-to) 1193-1201
Publisher Amsterdam: Sic Sat
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
Abstract The practice of constructing imaginary scenarios for the sake of argument is sometimes referred to as ‘thought experimentation.’ In this paper, I employ analytical tools from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation in order to clarify two theoretical puzzles that have been formulated with respect to thought experimentation. I do so by analysing the place and function of argumentative moves that contain suppositions in their propositional content. Three such moves are distinguished: proposing suppositions, accepting suppositions and using suppositions.
Document type Conference contribution
Language English
Permalink to this page
Back